http://stneotscitizen.com/2010/01/31/two-year-restraining-order-placed-on-eynesbury-councillor/ Now With A New Logo!! Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:38:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 http://stneotscitizen.com/2010/01/31/two-year-restraining-order-placed-on-eynesbury-councillor/comment-page-1/#comment-235 Oi!! Correspondant Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:25:44 +0000 http://stneotscitizen.com/?p=798#comment-235 I think the court is of the view that the councillor in question has had more than enough time to think "logically." This order prevents further attempts at illogical cognitive rationale for a period of two years. Should the councillor choose to think logically it may well help with any appeal. The Citizen doubts this outcome though. I think the court is of the view that the councillor in question has had more than enough time to think “logically.” This order prevents further attempts at illogical cognitive rationale for a period of two years. Should the councillor choose to think logically it may well help with any appeal. The Citizen doubts this outcome though.

]]> http://stneotscitizen.com/2010/01/31/two-year-restraining-order-placed-on-eynesbury-councillor/comment-page-1/#comment-233 /\dam Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:59:47 +0000 http://stneotscitizen.com/?p=798#comment-233 "prevents him from entering into any *logical* thought process for two years," surely? “prevents him from entering into any *logical* thought process for two years,” surely?

]]>